AEC Systems
May 18, 2012, 03:19:23 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Gradings 'overlapping' / not transitioning  (Read 292 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Shaun O
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7


« on: November 02, 2011, 03:56:08 pm »

Wonder if anyone can point me in the right direction with this...

I have a closed featureline (pond boundary) with levels from existing ground.
Lets say for arguments sake it has 4 sides (in practice its irregular).
All sides are to be graded down to one specific RL.
But I want one of the sides to be at a different slope from the other 3 sides.

I'm trying to grade it within the same grading group - is this correct?
As I keep getting a conflicting error saying that the gradings 'overlap'.
It asks for a transition length (as I pick the same station on the featureline for both the start and finish of the different gradings), I go with the default 10m transition, but it doesn't seem to work.
I just want the gradings to connect/transition together so I can build an automatic surface from the same grading group.

Any ideas??
Logged
Shaun O
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7


« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2011, 04:09:48 pm »

OK for reference- sussed it with a slightly different method.

Created the different criteria gradings with a gap between them, then used the 'create transition' tool. Simple.
Logged
SeanT
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 701



WWW
« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2011, 08:04:36 am »

Cool!

There may be a variation on this - I'll discuss it internally and have someone post back here.

cheers,
SeanT
Logged

Sean Twomey
AEC SYSTEMS - Civil Solutions Director

BLOG - www.edgeofwedge.com
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.082 seconds with 18 queries.